Tuesday, September 14, 2010

The Nature of Science

Teaching the nature of science is very different from the way I was taught. Science should not be following a set list of directions, and using the scientific method for everything. We talked in class that science is based on what we can understand. Since everyone has different background knowledge this can be a great way for students to share experiences, and create their own meaning. The list we wrote down of terms from the nature of science I think are very relevant and could be easily integrated into the classroom. Maybe not all in elementary school, but my high school science teachers could learn a thing or two from Professor Kruse. I think you can simplify the items so that most of them will work in an elementary classroom, such as imagination/creativity, social interaction of scientists, and observations. Diversity is stressed as being an important component in the classroom, so you could bring in cultural and societal impacts with upper elementary students. Discuss what your students specific cultures believe and how that affects science. Another topic to bring up could be that scientists also work with scientists from other countries as well as other scientists in the United States. I think teaching the nature of science makes the whole subject much more relevant and easier to apply. Science shouldn't be big and scary and all about memorizing facts. Professor Kruse has shown there is a better way to present material where students increase learning.

2 comments:

  1. I really like what you had to say. I think that allowing students to guide what and how you teach is such a good teaching tool. Every classroom will be different and unique, which is a very good thing. Teachers need to realize how important and useful those differences can be when teaching.

    I also like what you said about how science is more than memorizing facts. So often in schools, kids are lead to believe that science is supposed be boring and all about memorizing facts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also was taught the more traditional way of science in high school. We did activities which prompted us to follow directions. But I did have an AMAZING teacher who asked similar questions to the class, just as Professor Kruse does. He was focused in getting the class to think in abstract terms and apply this thinking to real-life concepts.

    ReplyDelete